MBAPX vs. FCSRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MBAPX (Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio) and FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX returned 7.74%/yr vs 4.40%/yr for FCSRX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MBAPX charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for FCSRX.

Performance

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBAPX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than FCSRX's 6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 7.74%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.40% annualized return.

MBAPX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 8.38%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 5.47%
• 10Y*: 7.74%

FCSRX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 7.74%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 4.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio	8.61%	13.46%	9.04%	14.02%	-16.06%	8.09%	12.98%	19.90%	-4.91%	13.38%
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	6.09%	9.27%	4.75%	3.60%	-4.26%	14.68%	2.60%	9.54%	-5.03%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MBAPX and FCSRX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between MBAPX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MBAPX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBAPX

MBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 68
MBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FCSRX

FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBAPX	FCSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.38	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.28	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.45	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	4.10	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	17.06	-4.40

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBAPX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBAPX drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBAPX and FCSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBAPX	FCSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-33.91%	+9.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-2.76%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.32%	-5.85%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.54%	-13.22%	-11.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.54%	-20.02%	-4.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-2.76%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-5.09%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	0.66%	+0.84%

Volatility

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.39%. This indicates that MBAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBAPX	FCSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	1.39%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	3.72%	+3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.63%	4.76%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.44%	6.89%	+3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.65%	6.71%	+3.94%

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBAPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBAPX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

MBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than FCSRX's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	3.34%	3.74%	3.86%	4.35%	6.51%	4.53%	1.32%	2.20%	8.51%	1.58%	1.34%	0.66%
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio	4.59%	4.93%	4.30%	2.23%	2.82%	2.12%	4.82%	3.80%	5.32%	3.76%	2.99%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBAPX and FCSRX in my portfolio?

MBAPX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBAPX or FCSRX?

MBAPX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to FCSRX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBAPX dropped -24.54% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.