PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAXI vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAXI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAXI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAXI
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF
-32.46%-28.59%89.44%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-3.45%18.62%19.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXI achieves a -32.46% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's -3.45% return.


MAXI

1D
0.62%
1M
-7.29%
YTD
-32.46%
6M
-61.88%
1Y
-39.58%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
1.01%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAXI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXI has a 11.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MAXI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXI
MAXI Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAXIQQQIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

1.09

-1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.40

1.68

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.25

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

1.93

-2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

8.69

-9.73

MAXI vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXI Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXI and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAXIQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.09

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.90

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between MAXI and QQQI is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MAXI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

MAXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.44%, more than QQQI's 14.90% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
MAXI
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF
70.44%49.00%32.06%29.63%4.43%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.90%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MAXI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXI drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXI and QQQI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAXIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.78%

-20.00%

-46.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.78%

-11.46%

-55.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.76%

-5.72%

-60.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.70%

-2.31%

-14.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.97%

2.54%

+32.43%

Volatility

MAXI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) has a higher volatility of 17.90% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.18%. This indicates that MAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAXIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.90%

6.18%

+11.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.79%

11.23%

+42.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.39%

19.72%

+56.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.47%

17.48%

+46.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.47%

17.48%

+46.99%