MATFX vs. FEATX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MATFX (Matthews Asia Innovators Fund) and FEATX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MATFX returned 15.23%/yr vs 14.79%/yr for FEATX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MATFX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for FEATX.

Performance

MATFX vs. FEATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATFX achieves a 54.12% return, which is significantly higher than FEATX's 33.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MATFX having a 15.23% annualized return and FEATX not far behind at 14.79%.

MATFX

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.88%
• 6M: 42.54%
• YTD: 54.12%
• 1Y: 77.15%
• 3Y*: 32.52%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

FEATX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 25.54%
• YTD: 33.68%
• 1Y: 56.32%
• 3Y*: 31.87%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 14.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATFX vs. FEATX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund	54.12%	30.22%	16.47%	-1.77%	-24.66%	-5.90%	86.75%	29.60%	-18.59%	52.78%
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	33.68%	36.34%	20.32%	13.22%	-30.99%	-15.29%	72.05%	30.26%	-15.36%	45.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MATFX and FEATX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1999	0.86

The correlation between MATFX and FEATX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MATFX vs. FEATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATFX

MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FEATX

FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATFX vs. FEATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MATFX	FEATX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.37	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.84	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.43	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.06	4.17	+2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.28	13.74	+3.55

MATFX vs. FEATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MATFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the FEATX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATFX and FEATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MATFX vs. FEATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATFX drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, which is greater than FEATX's maximum drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATFX and FEATX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MATFX	FEATX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.88%	-60.97%	-15.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-13.58%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.19%	-17.43%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.73%	-51.81%	+9.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.42%	-58.09%	+5.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.23%	-5.35%	-4.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.08%	-20.62%	-7.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	4.11%	+0.44%

Volatility

MATFX vs. FEATX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a higher volatility of 15.33% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) at 11.37%. This indicates that MATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MATFX	FEATX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.33%	11.37%	+3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.71%	21.53%	+4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.31%	23.92%	+4.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.56%	23.63%	+1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	21.34%	+1.88%

MATFX vs. FEATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATFX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MATFX vs. FEATX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MATFX nor FEATX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.43%	6.70%	5.07%	6.24%	0.03%	0.89%	0.87%
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	26.54%	31.07%	1.67%	0.29%	2.63%	8.44%	0.00%	15.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MATFX and FEATX in my portfolio?

MATFX and FEATX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MATFX or FEATX?

MATFX has higher volatility (15.33%) compared to FEATX (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATFX dropped -76.88% vs FEATX's -60.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.