PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEATX vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEATX vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 39.88% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's 27.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEATX having a 15.80% annualized return and HACK not far ahead at 15.84%.


FEATX

1D
1.88%
1M
12.48%
YTD
39.88%
6M
45.14%
1Y
75.17%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
15.80%

HACK

1D
-3.00%
1M
24.54%
YTD
27.17%
6M
21.31%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
27.72%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEATX vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEATX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M
39.88%36.34%20.32%13.22%-30.99%-15.29%72.05%30.26%-15.36%45.82%
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
27.17%7.97%23.49%37.44%-28.16%7.03%41.51%23.39%6.61%19.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FEATX and HACK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.52

The correlation between FEATX and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEATX vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEATX
HACK

Technology

42.6%
93.0%

Financial Services

14.9%
0.1%

Industrials

11.3%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%

-

Communication Services

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

5.1%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Energy

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FEATX
42.6%
HACK
93.0%

Financial Services

FEATX
14.9%
HACK
0.1%

Industrials

FEATX
11.3%
HACK
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FEATX
10.8%
HACK

-

Communication Services

FEATX
7.4%
HACK

-

Basic Materials

FEATX
5.1%
HACK

-

Healthcare

FEATX
4.2%
HACK

-

Energy

FEATX
2.0%
HACK

-

Consumer Defensive

FEATX
1.9%
HACK

-

Real Estate

FEATX

-

HACK

-

Utilities

FEATX

-

HACK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEATX vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEATX
FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEATX vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEATXHACKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.84

0.85

+2.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.55

1.27

+3.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.16

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.60

1.05

+4.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.29

2.52

+17.77

FEATX vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEATX Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEATX and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEATXHACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

0.85

+2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.49

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.68

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.57

-0.10

Drawdowns

FEATX vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and HACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEATXHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.97%

-42.68%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-20.67%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-21.90%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.63%

-38.68%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.09%

-38.68%

-19.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.00%

+3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.68%

-11.63%

-9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

8.58%

-4.84%

Volatility

FEATX vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) is 8.58%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that FEATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEATXHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

10.68%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

21.52%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

25.47%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

24.18%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

23.27%

-2.29%

FEATX vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEATX vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEATX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.43%6.70%5.07%6.24%0.03%0.89%0.87%
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEATX and HACK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HACK has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to FEATX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEATX dropped -60.97% vs HACK's -42.68%.

FEATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEATX and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer