FEATX vs. HACK

In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FEATX has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 7.49%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FEATX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEATX and HACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and HACK.

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.