FEATX vs. HACK

In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's -0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FEATX has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 6.63%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FEATX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEATX and HACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and HACK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) is 11.29%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 16.11%. This indicates that FEATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.