FEATX vs. MGSEX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FEATX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M) and MGSEX (AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FEATX returned 13.45%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for MGSEX. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEATX charges 1.45%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for MGSEX.

Performance

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 23.29% return, which is significantly higher than MGSEX's 21.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FEATX has underperformed MGSEX with an annualized return of 13.45%, while MGSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.

FEATX

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: -6.71%
• 6M: 13.07%
• YTD: 23.29%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 26.66%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: 13.45%
• ALL TIME*: 9.52%

MGSEX

• 1D: 4.78%
• 1M: -11.74%
• 6M: 9.52%
• YTD: 21.75%
• 1Y: 45.09%
• 3Y*: 19.68%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: 14.72%
• ALL TIME*: 10.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	23.29%	36.34%	20.32%	13.22%	-30.99%	-15.29%	72.05%	30.26%	-15.36%	45.82%
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	21.75%	41.56%	7.23%	-4.82%	-27.91%	0.83%	38.74%	80.58%	-3.77%	20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FEATX and MGSEX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 1999	0.57

Over the past year, FEATX and MGSEX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FEATX vs. MGSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEATX

FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MGSEX

MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 45
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEATX	MGSEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.32	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.73	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	1.68	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	6.28	+1.84

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEATX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the MGSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEATX and MGSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, roughly equal to the maximum MGSEX drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and MGSEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEATX	MGSEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.97%	-62.06%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.62%	-25.18%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	-25.18%	+7.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.88%	-42.34%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.09%	-45.32%	-12.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.71%	-21.61%	+8.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-13.86%	-6.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	6.71%	-1.91%

Volatility

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) is 9.96%, while AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a volatility of 12.69%. This indicates that FEATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEATX	MGSEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	12.69%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.06%	29.00%	-5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.40%	31.93%	-6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.76%	21.81%	+1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	26.70%	-5.19%

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MGSEX's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEATX vs. MGSEX - Dividend Comparison

FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.43%	6.70%	5.07%	6.24%	0.03%	0.89%	0.87%
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	0.11%	0.14%	0.47%	0.11%	0.00%	83.77%	4.35%	59.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEATX and MGSEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FEATX and MGSEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEATX or MGSEX?

MGSEX has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to FEATX (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEATX dropped -60.97% vs MGSEX's -62.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.