MATFX vs. EEMA

In the year-to-date period, MATFX achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than EEMA's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MATFX has outperformed EEMA with an annualized return of 7.31%, while EEMA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MATFX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MATFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is comparable to the EEMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATFX and EEMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.

The maximum MATFX drawdown since its inception was -77.90%, which is greater than EEMA's maximum drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATFX and EEMA.

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.