FEATX vs. FERIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX).
FEATX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999. FERIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999.
Performance
FEATX vs. FERIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEATX vs. FERIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M | 0.77% | 36.34% | 20.32% | 13.22% | -30.99% | -15.29% | 72.05% | 30.26% | -15.36% | 45.82% |
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I | 0.92% | 37.04% | 20.95% | 13.84% | -30.60% | -14.83% | 72.97% | 31.02% | -14.87% | 45.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than FERIX's 0.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEATX having a 12.08% annualized return and FERIX not far ahead at 12.65%.
FEATX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 33.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
FERIX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEATX vs. FERIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FERIX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEATX vs. FERIX — Risk / Return Rank
FEATX
FERIX
FEATX vs. FERIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEATX | FERIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.65 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.18 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.27 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 8.22 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEATX | FERIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.65 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.35 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEATX and FERIX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEATX vs. FERIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEATX nor FERIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.43% | 6.70% | 5.07% | 6.24% | 0.03% | 0.89% | 0.87% |
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 12.49% | 6.58% | 5.30% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 1.29% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FEATX vs. FERIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FERIX drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and FERIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEATX | FERIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.97% | -60.82% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.58% | -13.53% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.63% | -53.29% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.09% | -57.71% | -0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.58% | -13.53% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.80% | -18.22% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 3.73% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FEATX vs. FERIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) have volatilities of 9.62% and 9.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEATX | FERIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 9.61% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 14.64% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.31% | 20.29% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 22.55% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 20.70% | +0.01% |