PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATFX vs. CHILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MATFX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATFX achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly higher than CHILX's 5.98% return.


MATFX

1D
2.55%
1M
-12.90%
6M
24.99%
YTD
36.26%
1Y
53.68%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
13.68%
ALL TIME*
6.75%

CHILX

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.86%
6M
2.25%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MATFX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
36.26%30.22%16.47%-1.77%-24.66%-5.90%86.75%30.88%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
5.98%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MATFX and CHILX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.63

The correlation between MATFX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MATFX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MATFX
MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MATFX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MATFXCHILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.81

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

5.84

+2.59

MATFX vs. CHILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MATFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the CHILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATFX and CHILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MATFX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATFX drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATFX and CHILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATFXCHILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.88%

-47.73%

-29.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.61%

-11.64%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-22.21%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.71%

-43.88%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.64%

-11.34%

-9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.06%

-20.18%

-7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

3.61%

+2.56%

Volatility

MATFX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) at 10.16%. This indicates that MATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATFXCHILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

10.16%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.17%

17.04%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.75%

20.70%

+9.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

20.76%

+4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

22.11%

+1.28%

MATFX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATFX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MATFX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison

MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.77%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.54%31.07%1.67%0.29%2.63%8.44%0.00%15.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


MATFX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MATFX has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to CHILX (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATFX dropped -76.88% vs CHILX's -47.73%.

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MATFX and CHILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer