MATE vs. THIR
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and THIR (THOR Index Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. MATE is actively managed, while THIR is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for THIR.
Performance
MATE vs. THIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than THIR's 7.85% return.
MATE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THIR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. THIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 20.78% | 4.27% |
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF | 7.85% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and THIR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. THIR — Risk / Return Rank
MATE
THIR
MATE vs. THIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MATE | THIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.07 | 1.74 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
MATE vs. THIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than THIR's maximum drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and THIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | THIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -10.05% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.71% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -1.99% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
MATE vs. THIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | THIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 11.56% | +10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 12.64% | +9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 12.64% | +9.12% |
MATE vs. THIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than THIR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. THIR - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and THIR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THIR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THIR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
THIR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.70% for THIR.
Find the right allocation for MATE and THIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer