PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THIR vs. ALLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THIR vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THIR vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
-3.75%28.35%
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.95%15.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THIR achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 4.95% return.


THIR

1D
2.48%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
-3.75%
6M
-0.89%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALLW

1D
1.98%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
4.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


THIR vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

THIR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

THIR vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THIR
THIR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
THIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
THIR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
THIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
THIR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THIR vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THIRALLWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.53

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.06

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.34

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.69

10.17

+2.52

THIR vs. ALLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THIR Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the ALLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THIR and ALLW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THIRALLWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.53

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

1.51

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between THIR and ALLW is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

THIR vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

THIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ALLW's 4.45% yield.


TTM20252024
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
0.37%0.35%0.29%
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.45%4.67%0.00%

Drawdowns

THIR vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THIR drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THIR and ALLW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THIRALLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-8.78%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-8.78%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.62%

-4.28%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-1.18%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.02%

-0.07%

Volatility

THIR vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) is 4.55%, while SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that THIR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THIRALLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

5.41%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

8.56%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

13.08%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

12.83%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

12.83%

+0.03%