PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATE vs. ASGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MATE vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly lower than ASGM's 22.52% return.


MATE

1D
-0.07%
1M
7.70%
YTD
20.78%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASGM

1D
-0.53%
1M
7.21%
YTD
22.52%
6M
24.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATE vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MATE
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
20.78%4.27%
ASGM
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF
22.52%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MATE and ASGM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MATE vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MATE vs. ASGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MATEASGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.07

2.95

+0.12

Drawdowns

MATE vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and ASGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATEASGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-6.62%

-6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.53%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-1.22%

-2.05%

Volatility

MATE vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATEASGMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

15.67%

+6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

15.67%

+6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

15.67%

+6.09%

MATE vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MATE vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison

MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MATE and ASGM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASGM is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASGM is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.

They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.86% for ASGM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MATE and ASGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer