ASGM vs. GDT
ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASGM charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
ASGM vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 12.73% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASGM and GDT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASGM vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASGM vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASGM drawdown since its inception was -6.62%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGM and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASGM | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -24.66% | +18.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -24.34% | +19.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -12.36% | +10.80% |
Volatility
ASGM vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASGM | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 31.95% | -15.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 31.95% | -15.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 31.95% | -15.08% |
ASGM vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASGM has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASGM vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than GDT's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.85% | 4.52% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.77% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASGM and GDT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.77% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for ASGM and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for ASGM and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer