MASKX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
MASKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 9, 1997. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
MASKX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MASKX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MASKX iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund | -2.51% | 12.76% | 11.35% | 16.99% | -20.39% | 14.54% | 19.99% | 25.54% | -11.03% | 14.61% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MASKX achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MASKX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
MASKX
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MASKX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MASKX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MASKX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
MASKX
FASGX
MASKX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MASKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.21 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.73 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.55 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 6.89 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MASKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.21 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.53 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.70 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.60 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MASKX and FASGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MASKX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
MASKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MASKX iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.13% | 4.81% | 2.92% | 1.70% | 7.64% | 1.42% | 3.43% | 4.26% | 3.15% | 4.60% | 3.63% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
MASKX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MASKX drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASKX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MASKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.06% | -47.35% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -9.07% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.98% | -23.54% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.68% | -27.20% | -14.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.01% | -7.95% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -6.74% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.04% | +1.64% |
Volatility
MASKX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that MASKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MASKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 4.57% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 7.78% | +6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 12.82% | +10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 12.14% | +11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 12.56% | +11.07% |