PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASGX vs. MJFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 47.58% return, which is significantly higher than MJFOX's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has outperformed MJFOX with an annualized return of 12.96%, while MJFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.


MASGX

1D
2.20%
1M
9.83%
YTD
47.58%
6M
49.46%
1Y
72.60%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
12.96%

MJFOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.96%
6M
18.02%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
47.58%22.83%-2.51%7.99%-14.37%5.33%42.90%12.56%-9.70%33.75%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
16.96%22.72%16.31%25.79%-27.84%-5.79%29.80%26.08%-20.12%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MASGX and MJFOX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.58

The correlation between MASGX and MJFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASGX vs. MJFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASGX
MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MJFOX
MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MASGXMJFOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.46

1.27

+2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.22

1.94

+2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.24

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

1.91

+3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.58

6.82

+12.76

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the MJFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASGX and MJFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MASGXMJFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

1.27

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.42

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.48

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.37

+0.31

Drawdowns

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum MJFOX drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and MJFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASGXMJFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.34%

-63.52%

+27.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-14.53%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.94%

-17.14%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.34%

-42.85%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-42.85%

+6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-21.26%

+10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

4.04%

-0.23%

Volatility

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) at 4.91%. This indicates that MASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MJFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASGXMJFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

4.91%

+4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

17.20%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.97%

21.89%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

20.41%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

18.85%

-0.17%

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MJFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MASGX vs. MJFOX - Dividend Comparison

MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than MJFOX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
3.78%5.58%2.58%7.52%5.39%2.60%5.66%1.36%4.52%3.70%1.47%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.67%1.96%2.12%6.09%7.19%8.08%10.15%8.63%4.14%3.90%1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASGX and MJFOX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASGX has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to MJFOX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASGX dropped -36.34% vs MJFOX's -63.52%.

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASGX and MJFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer