MASGX vs. MINDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MASGX (Matthews Asia ESG Fund) and MINDX (Matthews India Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Matthews. Over the past 10 years, MASGX returned 12.96%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for MINDX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MASGX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MINDX.

Performance

MASGX vs. MINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 47.58% return, which is significantly higher than MINDX's -12.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has outperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 12.96%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.

MASGX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 9.83%
• YTD: 47.58%
• 6M: 49.46%
• 1Y: 72.60%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

MINDX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: -12.84%
• 6M: -12.27%
• 1Y: -9.91%
• 3Y*: 3.98%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASGX vs. MINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	47.58%	22.83%	-2.51%	7.99%	-14.37%	5.33%	42.90%	12.56%	-9.70%	33.75%
MINDX Matthews India Fund	-12.84%	1.61%	9.99%	23.14%	-9.87%	17.87%	16.46%	-0.79%	-9.80%	33.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MASGX and MINDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.54

The correlation between MASGX and MINDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MASGX vs. MINDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASGX

MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 91
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MINDX

MINDX Risk / Return Rank: 1
MINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASGX vs. MINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MASGX	MINDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.46	-0.70	+4.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	-0.93	+5.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	0.89	+0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.34	-0.50	+5.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.58	-1.27	+20.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MASGX vs. MINDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the MINDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASGX and MINDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MASGX	MINDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.46	-0.70	+4.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.19	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.32	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.40	+0.28

Drawdowns

MASGX vs. MINDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and MINDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MASGX	MINDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.34%	-72.18%	+35.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.20%	-21.96%	+7.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.94%	-26.51%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.34%	-26.51%	-9.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.34%	-48.46%	+12.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-20.40%	+20.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.23%	-14.95%	+3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	8.53%	-4.72%

Volatility

MASGX vs. MINDX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 5.24%. This indicates that MASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MASGX	MINDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.70%	5.24%	+4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.92%	13.09%	+5.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.97%	15.73%	+6.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	15.90%	+4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	17.43%	+1.25%

MASGX vs. MINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MASGX vs. MINDX - Dividend Comparison

MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than MINDX's 7.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	3.78%	5.58%	2.58%	7.52%	5.39%	2.60%	5.66%	1.36%	4.52%	3.70%	1.47%	0.00%
MINDX Matthews India Fund	7.76%	6.76%	15.03%	3.07%	15.30%	9.87%	3.03%	12.04%	16.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MASGX and MINDX in my portfolio?

MASGX and MINDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MASGX or MINDX?

MASGX has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to MINDX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASGX dropped -36.34% vs MINDX's -72.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.