MASGX vs. FEAAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MASGX (Matthews Asia ESG Fund) and FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MASGX returned 12.96%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for FEAAX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MASGX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for FEAAX.

Performance

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 47.58% return, which is significantly higher than FEAAX's 40.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has underperformed FEAAX with an annualized return of 12.96%, while FEAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.

MASGX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 9.83%
• YTD: 47.58%
• 6M: 49.46%
• 1Y: 72.60%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

FEAAX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 12.51%
• YTD: 40.03%
• 6M: 45.31%
• 1Y: 75.61%
• 3Y*: 34.98%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 16.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	47.58%	22.83%	-2.51%	7.99%	-14.37%	5.33%	42.90%	12.56%	-9.70%	33.75%
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	40.03%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MASGX and FEAAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.84

The correlation between MASGX and FEAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MASGX vs. FEAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASGX

MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 91
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MASGX	FEAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.46	3.86	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	4.58	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.68	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.34	5.64	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.58	20.46	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the FEAAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASGX and FEAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MASGX	FEAAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.46	3.86	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.38	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.77	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.40	+0.28

Drawdowns

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum FEAAX drawdown of -60.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and FEAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MASGX	FEAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.34%	-60.87%	+24.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.20%	-13.56%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.94%	-17.33%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.34%	-53.46%	+17.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.34%	-57.90%	+21.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.23%	-20.20%	+8.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	3.73%	+0.08%

Volatility

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) at 8.57%. This indicates that MASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MASGX	FEAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.70%	8.57%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.92%	16.67%	+2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.97%	19.82%	+2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	22.91%	-2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	20.97%	-2.29%

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAAX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MASGX vs. FEAAX - Dividend Comparison

MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund	3.78%	5.58%	2.58%	7.52%	5.39%	2.60%	5.66%	1.36%	4.52%	3.70%	1.47%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MASGX and FEAAX in my portfolio?

MASGX and FEAAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MASGX or FEAAX?

MASGX has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to FEAAX (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASGX dropped -36.34% vs FEAAX's -60.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.