MASGX vs. FEAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX).
MASGX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Apr 29, 2015. FEAAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 1994.
Performance
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 4.69% | 22.83% | -2.51% | 7.99% | -14.37% | 5.33% | 42.90% | 12.56% | -9.70% | 33.75% |
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 0.84% | 36.67% | 20.63% | 13.50% | -30.79% | -15.06% | 72.51% | 30.64% | -15.11% | 45.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than FEAAX's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has underperformed FEAAX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while FEAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.
MASGX
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
FEAAX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -12.55%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 33.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAAX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MASGX vs. FEAAX — Risk / Return Rank
MASGX
FEAAX
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MASGX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.16 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.24 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | 8.10 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MASGX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.10 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.60 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.35 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between MASGX and FEAAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Dividend Comparison
MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, while FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 5.33% | 5.58% | 2.58% | 7.52% | 5.39% | 2.60% | 5.66% | 1.36% | 4.52% | 3.70% | 1.47% | 0.00% |
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.88% | 6.62% | 5.21% | 6.49% | 0.03% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum FEAAX drawdown of -60.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and FEAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MASGX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.34% | -60.87% | +24.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -13.56% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.34% | -53.46% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.34% | -57.90% | +21.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -13.56% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.38% | -20.29% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 3.74% | +0.62% |
Volatility
MASGX vs. FEAAX - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) have volatilities of 9.85% and 9.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MASGX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 9.61% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 14.64% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 20.30% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 22.55% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 20.70% | -2.50% |