FEAAX vs. MINDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) and MINDX (Matthews India Fund) are both mutual funds - FEAAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MINDX is a India Equities fund managed by Matthews. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX returned 13.74%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for MINDX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MINDX.

Performance

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAAX achieves a 23.48% return, which is significantly higher than MINDX's -6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX has outperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 13.74%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.61% annualized return.

FEAAX

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: -6.69%
• 6M: 13.21%
• YTD: 23.48%
• 1Y: 42.32%
• 3Y*: 26.97%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 13.74%
• ALL TIME*: 8.24%

MINDX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: -0.58%
• YTD: -6.86%
• 1Y: -2.79%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: 3.91%
• 10Y*: 5.61%
• ALL TIME*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MINDX Matthews India Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	23.48%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%
MINDX Matthews India Fund	-6.86%	1.61%	9.99%	23.14%	-9.87%	17.87%	16.46%	-0.79%	-9.80%	33.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAAX and MINDX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2005	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FEAAX and MINDX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FEAAX vs. MINDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MINDX

MINDX Risk / Return Rank: 3
MINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAAX	MINDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	-0.19	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	-0.16	+2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.98	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	-0.14	+2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.22	-0.31	+8.53

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the MINDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAAX and MINDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and MINDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAAX	MINDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-72.18%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.60%	-21.96%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.33%	-26.51%	+9.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.72%	-26.51%	-24.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.90%	-48.46%	-9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.69%	-14.94%	+2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.13%	-14.96%	-5.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	9.81%	-5.02%

Volatility

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 4.94%. This indicates that FEAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAAX	MINDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	4.94%	+5.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.05%	13.60%	+9.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	16.29%	+9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.76%	16.09%	+7.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	17.51%	+3.99%

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAAX vs. MINDX - Dividend Comparison

FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%
MINDX Matthews India Fund	7.26%	6.76%	15.03%	3.07%	15.30%	9.87%	3.03%	12.04%	16.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAAX and MINDX in my portfolio?

FEAAX and MINDX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAAX or MINDX?

FEAAX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to MINDX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAAX dropped -60.87% vs MINDX's -72.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.