MARS vs. VIS
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. MARS is actively managed, while VIS is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VIS.
Performance
MARS vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -26.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
MARS vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | -2.67% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and VIS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VIS
MARS vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.60% | -63.51% | +17.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.60% | -3.74% | -41.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -8.34% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.55% | 17.69% | +49.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 18.54% | +49.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 20.45% | +47.10% |
MARS vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and VIS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.09% for VIS.
Find the right allocation for MARS and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer