PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARMX vs. TDIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund (MARMX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MARMX having a 3.75% return and TDIFX slightly higher at 3.88%.


MARMX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.93%
YTD
3.75%
6M
3.95%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*

TDIFX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.22%
YTD
3.88%
6M
3.88%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MARMX
Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund
3.75%10.54%5.88%7.79%-11.40%3.49%890.98%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
3.88%7.22%6.21%7.76%-9.37%14.53%7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MARMX and TDIFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020

0.74

The correlation between MARMX and TDIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARMX vs. TDIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARMX
MARMX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MARMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MARMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIFX
TDIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund (MARMX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARMXTDIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.57

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.56

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.05

15.52

-0.47

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the TDIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARMX and TDIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARMXTDIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.79

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.89

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.06

-0.91

Drawdowns

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARMX drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than TDIFX's maximum drawdown of -12.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARMX and TDIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARMXTDIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-12.21%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-2.61%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.64%

-3.51%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.94%

-12.21%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-1.75%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.58%

+0.24%

Volatility

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Volatility Comparison

Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund (MARMX) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) at 1.01%. This indicates that MARMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARMXTDIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

1.01%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

2.49%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08%

3.33%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

5.89%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

393.36%

5.06%

+388.30%

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARMX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIFX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MARMX vs. TDIFX - Dividend Comparison

MARMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than TDIFX's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MARMX
Mutual of America Retirement Income Fund
4.16%4.32%4.16%1.55%5.73%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
1.99%1.77%3.11%3.09%4.66%9.39%1.39%1.98%2.11%0.98%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARMX and TDIFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MARMX has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to TDIFX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARMX dropped -16.21% vs TDIFX's -12.21%.

TDIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARMX and TDIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer