PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARFX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARFX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MARFX having a 11.39% return and FASGX slightly higher at 11.93%. Over the past 10 years, MARFX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


MARFX

1D
1.11%
1M
6.32%
YTD
11.39%
6M
12.61%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
11.09%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARFX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MARFX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund
11.39%13.68%6.71%12.58%-4.06%26.43%7.21%29.57%-9.55%8.79%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MARFX and FASGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1995

0.86

The correlation between MARFX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARFX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARFX
MARFX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MARFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MARFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARFX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARFXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.39

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

14.98

-4.75

MARFX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARFX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARFXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.61

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.69

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.79

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Drawdowns

MARFX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARFX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARFX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARFXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-47.35%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-7.95%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-12.80%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.07%

-23.54%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-27.20%

-14.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-6.71%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.79%

+0.72%

Volatility

MARFX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARFXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.30%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

8.39%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

10.34%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

12.27%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

12.65%

+6.35%

MARFX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARFX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

MARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
MARFX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund
10.17%11.33%7.46%3.70%4.50%11.16%2.13%3.95%8.41%22.19%5.43%15.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARFX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to MARFX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARFX dropped -55.39% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARFX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer