MARA vs. FSM
MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) and FSM (Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.) are both stocks. MARA operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while FSM operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MARA returned -10.09%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for FSM. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MARA vs. FSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 56.79% return, which is significantly higher than FSM's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed FSM with an annualized return of -10.09%, while FSM has yielded a comparatively higher 3.63% annualized return.
MARA
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 56.79%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- 1Y
- -6.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- -11.91%
- 10Y*
- -10.09%
FSM
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.69%
- 1Y
- 29.80%
- 3Y*
- 38.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.63%
MARA vs. FSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 56.79% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 586.84% | -89.59% | 214.75% | 1,084.48% | -39.16% | -91.17% | -40.41% |
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | -8.97% | 128.67% | 11.14% | 2.93% | -3.85% | -52.67% | 101.96% | 12.09% | -30.27% | -7.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARA and FSM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2012 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
MARA:
$5.35B
FSM:
$2.97B
MARA:
-$4.95
FSM:
$1.06
MARA:
6.68
FSM:
2.61
MARA:
$867.82M
FSM:
$1.10B
MARA:
$164.95M
FSM:
$598.05M
MARA:
$373.68M
FSM:
$743.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARA vs. FSM — Risk / Return Rank
MARA
FSM
MARA vs. FSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARA | FSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.13 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 0.73 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 1.87 | -2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARA vs. FSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than FSM's maximum drawdown of -92.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and FSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARA | FSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -92.25% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | -40.78% | -29.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.34% | -40.78% | -37.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.87% | -67.09% | -28.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.20% | -81.07% | -18.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.90% | -34.63% | -56.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.00% | -45.15% | -32.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.56% | 15.94% | +26.62% |
Volatility
MARA vs. FSM - Volatility Comparison
MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a higher volatility of 23.71% compared to Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) at 18.09%. This indicates that MARA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARA | FSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.71% | 18.09% | +5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.50% | 45.78% | +14.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.29% | 57.67% | +21.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.98% | 57.48% | +48.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.15% | 59.50% | +84.65% |
Dividends
MARA vs. FSM - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARA nor FSM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MARA vs. FSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MARA Holdings, Inc. and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MARA and FSM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARA has higher volatility (23.71%) compared to FSM (18.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs FSM's -92.25%.
FSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARA and FSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer