MAPP vs. NDOW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) and NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAPP returned 18.03% vs 16.28% for NDOW. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAPP charges 0.92%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for NDOW.

Performance

MAPP vs. NDOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPP achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than NDOW's 6.06% return.

MAPP

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NDOW

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 16.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAPP vs. NDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	5.16%	18.67%	6.61%
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	6.06%	14.80%	-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPP and NDOW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024	0.90

The correlation between MAPP and NDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAPP vs. NDOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPP

MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

NDOW

NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 54
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPP vs. NDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAPP	NDOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.69	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.30	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	2.28	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	9.05	+2.04

MAPP vs. NDOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the NDOW Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPP and NDOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAPP vs. NDOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPP drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than NDOW's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPP and NDOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAPP	NDOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-8.76%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.17%	-7.17%	+1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.59%	-2.68%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-1.41%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.80%	-0.17%

Volatility

MAPP vs. NDOW - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) at 4.47%. This indicates that MAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAPP	NDOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	4.47%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	8.35%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	9.66%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.98%	9.12%	+1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.98%	9.12%	+1.86%

MAPP vs. NDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPP has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than NDOW's 2.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAPP vs. NDOW - Dividend Comparison

MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than NDOW's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	2.82%	2.96%	2.41%	2.78%
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	1.17%	1.24%	1.39%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAPP and NDOW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MAPP and NDOW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MAPP or NDOW?

MAPP has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to NDOW (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPP dropped -12.92% vs NDOW's -8.76%.

Which ETF is better, MAPP or NDOW?

On 1-year performance, MAPP leads with 18.03% vs 16.28% for NDOW. On fees, MAPP is cheaper at 0.92% per year. On volatility, NDOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAPP or NDOW?

Over the 1-year period, MAPP has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAPP or NDOW?

MAPP is cheaper with a 0.92% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAPP or NDOW?

MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.17% for NDOW.

What is the main difference between MAPP and NDOW?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Anydrus Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.92% for MAPP and 2.15% for NDOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.