PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAMTX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust (MAMTX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMTX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MAMTX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 2.14%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.


MAMTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.48%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
2.14%

FASGX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.98%
YTD
11.27%
6M
12.13%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAMTX
Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust
2.14%3.97%3.90%4.89%-12.11%5.84%0.58%6.81%1.27%8.05%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.27%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MAMTX and FASGX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1991

0.04

Over the past year, MAMTX and FASGX have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAMTX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMTX
MAMTX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MAMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust (MAMTX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAMTXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.47

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.26

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

14.40

-5.73

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMTX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAMTXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.50

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.67

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.79

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.63

+0.57

Drawdowns

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMTX drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMTX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAMTXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-47.35%

+30.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-7.95%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-12.80%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

-23.54%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.83%

-27.20%

+10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.59%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-6.71%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.79%

-0.94%

Volatility

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust (MAMTX) is 1.13%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that MAMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAMTXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

3.37%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

8.40%

-6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

10.35%

-7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

12.27%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

12.65%

-7.81%

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAMTX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAMTX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

MAMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than FASGX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.59%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
MAMTX
Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust
3.90%5.00%4.23%2.70%1.96%2.00%2.39%2.83%4.74%2.89%3.91%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAMTX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to MAMTX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMTX dropped -16.83% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAMTX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer