PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAMA vs. COLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAMA vs. COLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMA achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than COLB's 4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MAMA has outperformed COLB with an annualized return of 39.90%, while COLB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.88% annualized return.


MAMA

1D
0.14%
1M
4.94%
YTD
8.60%
6M
25.54%
1Y
76.51%
3Y*
79.69%
5Y*
40.04%
10Y*
39.90%

COLB

1D
-2.02%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
4.85%
6M
4.03%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
-2.91%
10Y*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAMA vs. COLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAMA
Mama's Creations Inc.
8.60%69.47%62.12%173.54%-10.70%12.29%47.93%75.36%-46.92%80.56%
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
4.85%9.36%8.05%-5.86%-4.26%-6.24%-8.16%15.54%-14.36%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MAMA and COLB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2014

0.07

The correlation between MAMA and COLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAMA:

$606.22M

COLB:

$8.35B

EPS

MAMA:

$0.13

COLB:

$2.53

PE Ratio

MAMA:

113.62

COLB:

11.32

PEG Ratio

MAMA:

3.36

COLB:

1.54

PS Ratio

MAMA:

3.50

COLB:

2.24

PB Ratio

MAMA:

11.52

COLB:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAMA:

$171.71M

COLB:

$3.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAMA:

$43.05M

COLB:

$1.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAMA:

$15.46M

COLB:

$736.44M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAMA vs. COLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMA
MAMA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

COLB
COLB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMA vs. COLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAMACOLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.55

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

4.23

+4.00

MAMA vs. COLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the COLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMA and COLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAMACOLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.94

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

-0.08

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.10

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.17

+0.02

Drawdowns

MAMA vs. COLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMA drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, roughly equal to the maximum COLB drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMA and COLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAMACOLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.83%

-85.93%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.05%

-18.38%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.54%

-36.43%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.85%

-54.47%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.35%

-60.80%

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-25.98%

+10.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.87%

-27.55%

-18.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.33%

6.73%

+2.60%

Volatility

MAMA vs. COLB - Volatility Comparison

Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) at 7.31%. This indicates that MAMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAMACOLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.85%

7.31%

+6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.75%

18.61%

+21.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.85%

30.39%

+20.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.78%

38.17%

+19.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.80%

37.98%

+43.82%

Dividends

MAMA vs. COLB - Dividend Comparison

MAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
5.14%5.19%5.33%5.17%3.98%3.48%3.12%2.75%2.76%2.03%3.42%3.57%
MAMA
Mama's Creations Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MAMA vs. COLB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mama's Creations Inc. and Columbia Banking System, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
53.99M
816.00M
(MAMA) Total Revenue
(COLB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAMA vs. COLB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mama's Creations Inc. and Columbia Banking System, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.9%
0
Portfolio components
MAMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.96M and revenue of 53.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.9%.

COLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Banking System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 816.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MAMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 3.01M and revenue of 53.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

COLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Banking System, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 816.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MAMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.23M and revenue of 53.99M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

COLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Banking System, Inc. reported a net income of 192.00M and revenue of 816.00M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAMA and COLB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAMA has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to COLB (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMA dropped -89.83% vs COLB's -85.93%.

MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAMA and COLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer