PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COLB vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


COLBRF
YTD Return9.51%28.33%
1Y Return43.95%50.23%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.45%6.66%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.28%13.33%
10Y Return (Ann)5.49%13.95%
Sharpe Ratio1.111.73
Sortino Ratio1.622.28
Omega Ratio1.241.32
Calmar Ratio0.791.28
Martin Ratio2.258.53
Ulcer Index21.32%6.15%
Daily Std Dev43.12%30.42%
Max Drawdown-85.94%-92.65%
Current Drawdown-34.56%0.00%

Fundamentals


COLBRF
Market Cap$5.80B$21.94B
EPS$2.30$1.78
PE Ratio12.0413.47
PEG Ratio2.267.67
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.23B$5.72B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.07B$5.74B
EBITDA (TTM)$22.51M$818.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between COLB and RF is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

COLB vs. RF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, COLB achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 28.33% return. Over the past 10 years, COLB has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 5.49%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
61.45%
29.20%
COLB
RF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLB vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COLB, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COLB, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COLB, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COLB, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COLB, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.25
RF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RF, currently valued at 8.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.53

COLB vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLB and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
1.11
1.73
COLB
RF

Dividends

COLB vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

COLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than RF's 4.05% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
5.20%5.17%3.98%3.48%3.73%3.42%3.09%1.99%3.39%4.68%3.37%1.38%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.05%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

COLB vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLB drawdown since its inception was -85.94%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLB and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-34.56%
0
COLB
RF

Volatility

COLB vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 6.70%. This indicates that COLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
7.56%
6.70%
COLB
RF

Financials

COLB vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbia Banking System, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items