PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAMA vs. ZVIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMA achieves a 36.62% return, which is significantly higher than ZVIA's -26.72% return.


MAMA

1D
0.99%
1M
-1.34%
6M
22.05%
YTD
36.62%
1Y
127.81%
3Y*
70.02%
5Y*
45.98%
10Y*
42.87%
ALL TIME*
20.26%

ZVIA

1D
4.94%
1M
-2.86%
6M
-8.11%
YTD
-26.72%
1Y
-44.08%
3Y*
-14.81%
5Y*
-33.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-32.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.44M$10.86M$10.24M
$544.10K$874.22K$1.65M

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MAMA
Mama's Creations Inc.
36.62%69.47%62.12%173.54%-10.70%-21.79%
ZVIA
Zevia PBC
-26.72%-44.63%108.46%-50.86%-41.99%-43.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MAMA and ZVIA is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAMA:

$754.56M

ZVIA:

$122.02M

EPS

MAMA:

$0.14

ZVIA:

-$0.10

PS Ratio

MAMA:

4.11

ZVIA:

0.67

PB Ratio

MAMA:

14.42

ZVIA:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAMA:

$189.23M

ZVIA:

$169.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAMA:

$46.29M

ZVIA:

$79.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAMA:

$11.97M

ZVIA:

-$6.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAMA vs. ZVIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAMA
MAMA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVIA
ZVIA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ZVIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVIA Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVIA Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAMAZVIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.91

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

-0.67

+5.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

-0.98

+13.57

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the ZVIA Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMA and ZVIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMA drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, smaller than the maximum ZVIA drawdown of -96.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMA and ZVIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAMAZVIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.83%

-96.36%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.05%

-67.15%

+43.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.54%

-78.19%

+35.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.79%

-96.36%

+31.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

-89.95%

+79.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.40%

-78.57%

+33.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

46.16%

-36.34%

Volatility

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) is 10.18%, while Zevia PBC (ZVIA) has a volatility of 13.89%. This indicates that MAMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAMAZVIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

13.89%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.17%

54.42%

-16.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.47%

68.31%

-12.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.37%

88.87%

-31.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.87%

88.75%

-8.88%

Dividends

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAMA nor ZVIA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mama's Creations Inc. and Zevia PBC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MAMA vs. ZVIA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mama's Creations Inc. and Zevia PBC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MAMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.

ZVIA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Zevia PBC reported a gross profit of 22.29M and revenue of 46.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

MAMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

ZVIA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Zevia PBC reported an operating income of -2.37M and revenue of 46.09M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.

MAMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

ZVIA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Zevia PBC reported a net income of -2.27M and revenue of 46.09M, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAMA and ZVIA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVIA has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to MAMA (10.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMA dropped -89.83% vs ZVIA's -96.36%.

MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAMA and ZVIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer