MAMA vs. LINC
MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) and LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — MAMA in Packaged Foods, LINC in Education & Training Services. Over the past 10 years, MAMA returned 42.87%/yr vs 36.37%/yr for LINC. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MAMA vs. LINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMA achieves a 36.62% return, which is significantly lower than LINC's 73.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MAMA has outperformed LINC with an annualized return of 42.87%, while LINC has yielded a comparatively lower 36.37% annualized return.
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- YTD
- 36.62%
- 1Y
- 127.81%
- 3Y*
- 70.02%
- 5Y*
- 45.98%
- 10Y*
- 42.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.26%
LINC
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- 6M
- 56.86%
- YTD
- 73.17%
- 1Y
- 81.51%
- 3Y*
- 79.67%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.68M | $26.87M | $27.43M | |
| $8.44M | $10.86M | $10.24M |
MAMA vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 36.62% | 69.47% | 62.12% | 173.54% | -10.70% | 12.29% | 47.93% | 75.36% | -46.92% | 80.56% |
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 73.17% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMA and LINC is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014 | 0.07 |
The correlation between MAMA and LINC shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAMA:
$754.56M
LINC:
$1.33B
MAMA:
$0.14
LINC:
$0.72
MAMA:
127.34
LINC:
58.42
MAMA:
3.77
LINC:
2.05
MAMA:
4.11
LINC:
2.40
MAMA:
14.42
LINC:
6.59
MAMA:
$189.23M
LINC:
$544.69M
MAMA:
$46.29M
LINC:
$242.75M
MAMA:
$11.97M
LINC:
$49.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAMA vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank
MAMA
LINC
MAMA vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAMA | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.15 | 2.96 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 7.21 | +5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAMA vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMA drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, smaller than the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMA and LINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMA | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.83% | -99.11% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -28.18% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.54% | -28.18% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.79% | -40.63% | -24.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.35% | -57.51% | -21.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.75% | -24.89% | +14.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.40% | -58.76% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.82% | 11.53% | -1.71% |
Volatility
MAMA vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) is 10.18%, while Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a volatility of 21.08%. This indicates that MAMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAMA | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.18% | 21.08% | -10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.17% | 37.39% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.47% | 50.93% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.37% | 45.00% | +12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.87% | 57.16% | +22.71% |
Dividends
MAMA vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MAMA nor LINC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MAMA vs. LINC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mama's Creations Inc. and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAMA vs. LINC - Profitability Comparison
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAMA and LINC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINC has higher volatility (21.08%) compared to MAMA (10.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMA dropped -89.83% vs LINC's -99.11%.
MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAMA and LINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer