MAMA vs. AAPL
MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. MAMA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MAMA returned 35.78%/yr vs 29.36%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAMA vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMA achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MAMA has outperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 35.78%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively lower 29.36% annualized return.
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 87.31%
- 3Y*
- 75.68%
- 5Y*
- 38.65%
- 10Y*
- 35.78%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
MAMA vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 10.53% | 69.47% | 62.12% | 173.54% | -10.70% | 12.29% | 47.93% | 75.36% | -46.92% | 80.56% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMA and AAPL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014 | 0.05 |
The correlation between MAMA and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAMA:
$645.92M
AAPL:
$4.30T
MAMA:
$0.15
AAPL:
$8.24
MAMA:
101.52
AAPL:
35.35
MAMA:
3.00
AAPL:
4.65
MAMA:
3.28
AAPL:
9.60
MAMA:
11.67
AAPL:
40.37
MAMA:
$189.23M
AAPL:
$451.44B
MAMA:
$46.29M
AAPL:
$216.07B
MAMA:
$11.97M
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAMA vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
MAMA
AAPL
MAMA vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAMA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 3.40 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | 8.47 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAMA vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMA drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMA and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.83% | -81.80% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -13.80% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.54% | -33.36% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.85% | -33.36% | -35.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.35% | -38.52% | -40.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.21% | -7.64% | -6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -29.59% | -16.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 5.53% | +4.14% |
Volatility
MAMA vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.73%. This indicates that MAMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAMA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.32% | 6.73% | +12.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.09% | 16.53% | +16.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.50% | 22.64% | +29.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.99% | 27.52% | +30.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.61% | 28.92% | +52.69% |
Dividends
MAMA vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
MAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MAMA vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mama's Creations Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAMA vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAMA and AAPL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMA has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMA dropped -89.83% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAMA and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer