MAKX vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
MAKX and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAKX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2021. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both MAKX and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MAKX vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAKX vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 3.72% | 21.63% | 8.27% | 26.03% | -26.41% | 3.91% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 22.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return.
MAKX
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 44.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAKX vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAKX vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
MAKX
QLD
MAKX vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAKX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.84 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.43 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.49 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 4.88 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAKX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.84 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.53 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAKX and QLD is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MAKX vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
MAKX vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAKX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -83.13% | +42.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -25.13% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -20.10% | +10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -18.30% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 7.67% | -1.96% |
Volatility
MAKX vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is 10.24%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that MAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAKX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 12.96% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.72% | 25.55% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.34% | 44.91% | -12.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 44.77% | -16.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 44.47% | -16.44% |