MAIPX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
MAIPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 22, 2010. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAIPX MAI Managed Volatility Fund | -2.75% | 10.28% | 8.64% | 10.58% | -3.59% | 12.81% | 4.39% | 16.13% | -2.76% | 8.66% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAIPX achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MAIPX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 6.51%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
MAIPX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAIPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAIPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
MAIPX
FASGX
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAIPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.21 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.73 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.55 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 6.89 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAIPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.21 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.53 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.70 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAIPX and FASGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
MAIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAIPX MAI Managed Volatility Fund | 1.24% | 1.33% | 2.20% | 4.59% | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 1.74% | 2.89% | 2.12% | 0.80% | 4.17% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAIPX drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIPX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAIPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -47.35% | +21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -9.07% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.77% | -23.54% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.69% | -27.20% | +1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -7.95% | +4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -6.74% | +5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 2.04% | -0.61% |
Volatility
MAIPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) is 2.42%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that MAIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAIPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 4.57% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.37% | 7.78% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 12.82% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.80% | 12.14% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 12.56% | -1.61% |