PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAIN vs. CNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAIN vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAIN achieves a -12.08% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 37.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MAIN has underperformed CNQ with an annualized return of 12.99%, while CNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.22% annualized return.


MAIN

1D
-0.35%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-12.08%
6M
-13.81%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
12.99%

CNQ

1D
1.29%
1M
3.95%
YTD
37.99%
6M
38.89%
1Y
53.83%
3Y*
23.71%
5Y*
26.79%
10Y*
18.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAIN vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
-12.08%10.74%47.30%28.22%-11.37%48.31%-19.54%36.88%-8.27%16.62%
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
37.99%15.58%-1.31%23.72%42.82%83.55%-19.06%39.72%-29.92%15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MAIN and CNQ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2007

0.29

The correlation between MAIN and CNQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAIN:

$4.66B

CNQ:

$97.03B

EPS

MAIN:

$5.22

CNQ:

$4.65

PE Ratio

MAIN:

9.85

CNQ:

9.95

PEG Ratio

MAIN:

1.12

CNQ:

0.48

PS Ratio

MAIN:

6.55

CNQ:

2.37

PB Ratio

MAIN:

1.51

CNQ:

2.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAIN:

$704.17M

CNQ:

$40.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAIN:

$499.08M

CNQ:

$12.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAIN:

$396.90M

CNQ:

$22.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAIN vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAIN
MAIN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ
CNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAIN vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAINCNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.30

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

3.82

-3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

8.73

-9.09

MAIN vs. CNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the CNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAIN and CNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAINCNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.87

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.82

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.41

+0.15

Drawdowns

MAIN vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAIN drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, smaller than the maximum CNQ drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIN and CNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAINCNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.53%

-80.75%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.43%

-14.16%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-35.85%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-35.85%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

-77.84%

+13.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.30%

-7.60%

-11.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-23.52%

+16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

6.18%

+4.74%

Volatility

MAIN vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison

Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) have volatilities of 8.66% and 8.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAINCNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

8.80%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

23.90%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.94%

28.96%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

32.84%

-11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

40.26%

-12.95%

Dividends

MAIN vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison

MAIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than CNQ's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.76%5.01%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.78%5.26%3.49%4.56%3.08%2.94%4.21%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
8.35%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%

Financials

MAIN vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Main Street Capital Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
140.11M
10.84B
(MAIN) Total Revenue
(CNQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAIN vs. CNQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Main Street Capital Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
32.1%
Portfolio components
MAIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 140.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CNQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

MAIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 140.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CNQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

MAIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported a net income of 90.82M and revenue of 140.11M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.

CNQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAIN and CNQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNQ has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to MAIN (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAIN dropped -64.53% vs CNQ's -80.75%.

CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAIN and CNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer