PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGY vs. GDXW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGY vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly higher than GDXW's -4.89% return.


MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXW

1D
-4.02%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
2.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and GDXW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGY vs. GDXW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGYGDXWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

MAGY vs. GDXW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGYGDXWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.45

+1.08

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum GDXW drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and GDXW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGYGDXWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-36.83%

+22.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-32.99%

+29.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-13.45%

+10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

Volatility

MAGY vs. GDXW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGYGDXWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

61.39%

-47.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

61.39%

-46.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

61.39%

-46.82%

MAGY vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAGY and GDXW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MAGY vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, less than GDXW's 39.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGY and GDXW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGY and GDXW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 37.35% for MAGY.

MAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXW is Gold.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGY and GDXW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer