PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -26.21% return.


MAGX

1D
-2.59%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTW

1D
-7.81%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-26.21%
6M
-26.03%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
1.49%25.16%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-26.21%59.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and PLTW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.51

The correlation between MAGX and PLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGX vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGX
PLTW

Financial Services

25.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

20.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

MAGX
25.0%
PLTW

-

Basic Materials

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Communication Services

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Consumer Cyclical

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Consumer Defensive

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Energy

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Healthcare

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Industrials

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Real Estate

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Technology

MAGX

-

PLTW
20.0%

Utilities

MAGX

-

PLTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGXPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.05

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.02

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

-0.03

+4.24

MAGX vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGXPLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

-0.01

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.19

+0.66

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-46.29%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-46.29%

+9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-39.64%

+32.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-19.57%

+5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

25.21%

-13.12%

Volatility

MAGX vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) is 9.19%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that MAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

22.32%

-13.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

46.26%

-17.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.88%

61.73%

-21.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.52%

72.85%

-19.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.52%

72.85%

-19.33%

MAGX vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than PLTW's 121.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.02%2.05%0.86%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
121.30%72.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGX and PLTW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to MAGX (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs PLTW's -46.29%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs -0.85% for PLTW. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.99% for PLTW.

MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer