MAGX vs. PLTW
MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 50.73% vs -0.85% for PLTW. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.
Performance
MAGX vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -26.21% return.
MAGX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW
- 1D
- -7.81%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -26.21%
- 6M
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- -0.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGX vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 25.16% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -26.21% | 59.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGX and PLTW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MAGX and PLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGX vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGX
PLTW
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MAGX
PLTW
-
Basic Materials
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Communication Services
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Consumer Defensive
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Energy
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Healthcare
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Industrials
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Real Estate
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Technology
MAGX
-
PLTW
Utilities
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGX vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
MAGX
PLTW
MAGX vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | -0.02 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.03 | +4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | -0.01 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.19 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
MAGX vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.19% | -46.29% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.24% | -46.29% | +9.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -39.64% | +32.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -19.57% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.09% | 25.21% | -13.12% |
Volatility
MAGX vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) is 9.19%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that MAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 22.32% | -13.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 46.26% | -17.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 61.73% | -21.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 72.85% | -19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 72.85% | -19.33% |
MAGX vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGX vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than PLTW's 121.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.02% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 121.30% | 72.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGX and PLTW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to MAGX (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs PLTW's -46.29%.
On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs -0.85% for PLTW. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.
MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.99% for PLTW.
MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGX and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer