MAGX vs. PLTW
MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 28.07% vs -7.90% for PLTW. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.
Performance
MAGX vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -15.00% return.
MAGX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 28.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 41.16%
PLTW
- 1D
- 35.54%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -15.00%
- 1Y
- -7.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.93M | $4.39M | $4.75M | |
| $3.52M | $3.12M | $3.79M |
MAGX vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.37% | 25.00% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -15.00% | 28.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGX and PLTW is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MAGX and PLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGX vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGX
PLTW
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MAGX
PLTW
-
Basic Materials
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Communication Services
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Consumer Defensive
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Energy
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Healthcare
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Industrials
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Real Estate
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Technology
MAGX
-
PLTW
Utilities
MAGX
-
PLTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGX vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
MAGX
PLTW
MAGX vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.04 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.14 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | -0.25 | +2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGX vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.19% | -57.27% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.24% | -57.27% | +20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -30.48% | +21.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -25.27% | +11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.85% | 31.69% | -17.84% |
Volatility
MAGX vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) is 17.19%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 34.29%. This indicates that MAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGX | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.19% | 34.29% | -17.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.81% | 57.64% | -21.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.80% | 71.95% | -27.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.95% | 79.04% | -25.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.95% | 79.04% | -25.09% |
MAGX vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGX vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PLTW's 98.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.04% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 98.38% | 72.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGX and PLTW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (34.29%) compared to MAGX (17.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs PLTW's -57.27%.
On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 28.07% vs -7.90% for PLTW. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 17.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 28.07% return vs -7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 98.38%, compared with 2.04% for MAGX.
MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.99% for PLTW.
MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGX and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer