MAGX vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

MAGX vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a -9.90% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -79.53% return.

MAGX

• 1D: -5.68%
• 1M: -14.32%
• YTD: -9.90%
• 6M: -5.65%
• 1Y: 32.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -6.06%
• 1M: -34.90%
• YTD: -79.53%
• 6M: -82.87%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	-9.90%	1.00%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-79.53%	-80.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and BMNG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

MAGX vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX

MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

BMNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGX	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.60	—	—

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -96.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGX	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.19%	-96.19%	+42.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.87%	-96.19%	+78.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.76%	-81.77%	+68.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MAGX	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.32%	190.60%	-149.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.74%	190.60%	-136.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.74%	190.60%	-136.86%

MAGX vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGX vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	2.27%	2.05%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGX and BMNG in my portfolio?

MAGX and BMNG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MAGX or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGX or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGX or BMNG?

MAGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

What is the main difference between MAGX and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.75% for BMNG.