MAGX vs. 2MSF.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L).
MAGX and 2MSF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGX is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 28, 2024. 2MSF.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2017.
Performance
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | -25.26% | 26.16% | 81.14% |
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | -46.53% | 12.39% | -0.27% |
Different Trading Currencies
MAGX is traded in USD, while 2MSF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MSF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a -25.26% return, which is significantly higher than 2MSF.L's -46.53% return.
MAGX
- 1D
- 9.45%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- YTD
- -25.26%
- 6M
- -22.65%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2MSF.L
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -15.50%
- YTD
- -46.53%
- 6M
- -53.56%
- 1Y
- -16.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than 2MSF.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank
MAGX
2MSF.L
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGX | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | -0.25 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 0.09 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.32 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | -0.69 | +3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGX | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | -0.25 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGX and 2MSF.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Dividend Comparison
MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while 2MSF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.74% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, smaller than the maximum 2MSF.L drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and 2MSF.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGX | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.19% | -66.77% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.24% | -66.77% | +29.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.30% | -65.80% | +34.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.05% | -17.91% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.65% | 31.66% | -20.01% |
Volatility
MAGX vs. 2MSF.L - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) at 10.30%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAGX | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.68% | 10.30% | +6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.86% | 56.75% | -25.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.13% | 67.23% | -10.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 53.50% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 53.27% | +1.35% |