PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGS vs. XLKI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGS vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MAGS

1D
3.19%
1M
1.32%
6M
-0.29%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.62%

XLKI

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.06%
6M
9.29%
YTD
10.67%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$254.73M$303.60M$278.63M
$514.98K$430.22K$356.64K

MAGS vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and XLKI is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.69

The correlation between MAGS and XLKI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGS
XLKI

Technology

13.0%
99.2%

Communication Services

6.5%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MAGS
13.0%
XLKI
99.2%

Communication Services

MAGS
6.5%
XLKI
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGS
6.2%
XLKI

-

Basic Materials

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Consumer Defensive

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Energy

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Financial Services

MAGS

-

XLKI
99.9%

Healthcare

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Industrials

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Real Estate

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Utilities

MAGS

-

XLKI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGS vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKI
XLKI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XLKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGS vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGSXLKIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.02

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

7.10

-4.84

MAGS vs. XLKI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the XLKI Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and XLKI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -11.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and XLKI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGSXLKIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.91%

-11.21%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

-11.21%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-6.73%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-2.16%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

3.18%

+3.13%

Volatility

MAGS vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 8.02%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGSXLKIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

8.68%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

17.55%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

19.96%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.09%

19.92%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

19.92%

+6.17%

MAGS vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGS vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than XLKI's 17.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.48%1.48%0.81%0.44%
XLKI
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
17.91%8.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGS and XLKI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLKI has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to MAGS (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs XLKI's -11.21%.

On 1-year performance, XLKI leads with 24.59% vs 17.98% for MAGS. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLKI has performed better with a 24.59% return vs 17.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLKI.

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.91%, compared with 1.48% for MAGS.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MAGS and 0.35% for XLKI.

XLKI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGS and XLKI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer