MAGS vs. SQQQ

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). MAGS is actively managed, while SQQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 31.30%/yr vs -51.15%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.

Performance

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -36.18% return.

MAGS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 31.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.61%

SQQQ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 17.99%
• 6M: -34.34%
• YTD: -36.18%
• 1Y: -51.42%
• 3Y*: -51.15%
• 5Y*: -45.04%
• 10Y*: -54.75%
• ALL TIME*: -52.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.47%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	-36.18%	-53.05%	-49.79%	-53.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and SQQQ is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	-0.87

The correlation between MAGS and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	SQQQ
Technology	13.9%	-
Communication Services	8.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	113.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 30
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SQQQ

SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	-0.92	+1.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	-1.42	+2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.85	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	-0.84	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	-1.53	+4.64

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and SQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	SQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-100.00%	+70.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-61.03%	+42.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	-92.51%	+62.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.65%	-100.00%	+94.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-92.76%	+87.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.04%	33.69%	-27.65%

Volatility

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 7.49%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 21.99%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	SQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.49%	21.99%	-14.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.68%	46.34%	-29.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.47%	56.15%	-34.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.00%	67.92%	-41.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.00%	66.60%	-40.60%

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SQQQ's 9.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.46%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	9.36%	9.36%	10.23%	8.01%	0.28%	0.00%	2.15%	2.92%	1.47%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and SQQQ in my portfolio?

MAGS and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or SQQQ?

SQQQ has higher volatility (21.99%) compared to MAGS (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or SQQQ?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.30% vs -51.15% for SQQQ. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or SQQQ?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.30% return vs -51.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or SQQQ?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or SQQQ?

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.36%, compared with 1.46% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between MAGS and SQQQ?

MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.