MAGS vs. LAES
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while LAES (SEALSQ Corp) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 31.29%/yr vs -33.31%/yr for LAES. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAGS vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -17.99% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 21.59% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and LAES is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
LAES
MAGS vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGS | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.37 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.62 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -98.44% | +68.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -72.68% | +54.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -98.07% | +68.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -85.89% | +77.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -84.60% | +79.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 43.58% | -38.08% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 5.86%, while SEALSQ Corp (LAES) has a volatility of 28.38%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 28.38% | -22.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 66.23% | -51.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 109.13% | -88.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 170.29% | -144.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 170.29% | -144.32% |
Dividends
MAGS vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while LAES has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and LAES have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAES has higher volatility (28.38%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs LAES's -98.44%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer