MAGS vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MAGS is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGS returned 22.08% vs 143.52% for ASMH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

MAGS vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 71.44% return.

MAGS

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 2.56%
• 6M: 4.66%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 1Y: 22.08%
• 3Y*: 30.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 36.58%
• YTD: 71.44%
• 1Y: 143.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	3.27%	57.81%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.44%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and ASMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 32
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	3.37	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.73	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.45	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	9.79	-8.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	28.17	-24.50

MAGS vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-15.89%	-14.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-14.75%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-10.51%	+6.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-4.41%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.02%	5.17%	+0.85%

Volatility

MAGS vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 7.86%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 18.11%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.86%	18.11%	-10.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.65%	34.14%	-17.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.36%	43.78%	-22.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	41.26%	-15.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.01%	41.26%	-15.25%

MAGS vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than ASMH's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.63%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.43%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and ASMH in my portfolio?

MAGS and ASMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (18.11%) compared to MAGS (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 143.52% vs 22.08% for MAGS. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 7.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 143.52% return vs 22.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between MAGS and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.