MAGC vs. YXI
MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGC is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while YXI is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). MAGC is actively managed, while YXI is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -15.61% vs -3.19% for YXI. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
MAGC vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 6.15% return.
MAGC
- 1D
- 4.10%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -17.67%
- 1Y
- -15.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- -3.19%
- 3Y*
- -12.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.21%
- 10Y*
- -8.43%
MAGC vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -15.36% | 16.35% | -14.54% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 6.15% | -22.87% | 9.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGC and YXI is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | -0.89 |
The correlation between MAGC and YXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.89 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGC vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
MAGC
YXI
MAGC vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGC | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | -0.16 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | -0.09 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.99 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | -0.24 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -0.42 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGC | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | -0.16 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | -0.31 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
MAGC vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -32.86%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGC | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.86% | -81.15% | +48.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.86% | -14.66% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.88% | -78.33% | +49.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -54.30% | +39.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | 9.17% | +7.81% |
Volatility
MAGC vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 7.00%. This indicates that MAGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGC | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 7.00% | +3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.54% | 14.75% | +4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 19.89% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 31.40% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 27.42% | +6.94% |
MAGC vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGC vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than YXI's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.85% | 4.10% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.89% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGC and YXI have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGC has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to YXI (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -32.86% vs YXI's -81.15%.
On 1-year performance, YXI leads with -3.19% vs -15.61% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YXI has performed better with a -3.19% return vs -15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.
MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 2.89% for YXI.
MAGC is categorized as China Equities, while YXI is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.95% for YXI.
YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGC and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer