MAGC vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGC is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. MAGC is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -15.61% vs 78.18% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

MAGC vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.

MAGC

• 1D: 4.10%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: -15.36%
• 6M: -17.67%
• 1Y: -15.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 80.66%
• 6M: 78.46%
• 1Y: 78.18%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 15.57%
• 10Y*: 11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-15.36%	16.35%	-14.54%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	80.66%	-11.71%	-0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and DBO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	-0.02

The correlation between MAGC and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 4
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGC	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	2.28	-2.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	2.88	-3.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.37	-0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	4.62	-5.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	9.43	-10.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGC vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGC	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	2.28	-2.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	0.02	-0.31

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -32.86%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.86%	-90.18%	+57.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.86%	-18.19%	-14.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.88%	-52.46%	+23.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	-62.25%	+47.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.98%	8.92%	+8.06%

Volatility

MAGC vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is 10.63%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that MAGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	13.25%	-2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	28.15%	-8.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.65%	34.54%	-7.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	32.28%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.36%	31.78%	+2.58%

MAGC vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than DBO's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.94%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	4.85%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGC and DBO in my portfolio?

MAGC and DBO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGC or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to MAGC (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -32.86% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, MAGC or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 78.18% vs -15.61% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MAGC has been the lower-risk option at 10.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGC or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 78.18% return vs -15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or DBO?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or DBO?

MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 1.94% for DBO.

What is the main difference between MAGC and DBO?

MAGC is categorized as China Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.