MAGA vs. BLCR
MAGA (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MAGA is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Over the past year, MAGA returned 13.03% vs 38.07% for BLCR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGA charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
MAGA vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 16.56% return.
MAGA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 13.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 38.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGA vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 8.12% | 10.31% | 14.69% | 15.58% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 16.56% | 30.93% | 17.07% | 13.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and BLCR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MAGA and BLCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MAGA vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGA
BLCR
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MAGA
BLCR
Financial Services
MAGA
BLCR
Energy
MAGA
BLCR
Consumer Cyclical
MAGA
BLCR
Utilities
MAGA
BLCR
Consumer Defensive
MAGA
BLCR
-
Basic Materials
MAGA
BLCR
Real Estate
MAGA
BLCR
-
Healthcare
MAGA
BLCR
Technology
MAGA
BLCR
Communication Services
MAGA
-
BLCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGA vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
MAGA
BLCR
MAGA vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.73 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 16.81 | -11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -21.29% | -21.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -10.26% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -2.88% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -2.20% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.27% | +0.04% |
Volatility
MAGA vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 3.05%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 6.32% | -3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 13.10% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.32% | 16.42% | -5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 17.66% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.66% | +2.60% |
MAGA vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGA vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than BLCR's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.49% | 1.61% | 1.18% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGA and BLCR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLCR has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to MAGA (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs BLCR's -21.29%.
On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 38.07% vs 13.03% for MAGA. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 38.07% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.
MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.29% for BLCR.
They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.36% for BLCR.
BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGA and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer