PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAEFX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock EuroFund Fund (MAEFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAEFX achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MAEFX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 7.53%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


MAEFX

1D
0.90%
1M
6.17%
YTD
6.02%
6M
7.43%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
7.53%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAEFX
BlackRock EuroFund Fund
6.02%20.07%7.21%20.70%-23.85%19.53%19.34%25.17%-19.83%22.42%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MAEFX and FASGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1991

0.66

Over the past year, MAEFX and FASGX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.66, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAEFX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAEFX
MAEFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MAEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MAEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock EuroFund Fund (MAEFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAEFXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.49

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

3.39

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

14.98

-13.13

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAEFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAEFX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAEFXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.61

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.69

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.79

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.63

-0.26

Drawdowns

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAEFX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAEFX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAEFXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.58%

-47.35%

-15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-7.95%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-12.80%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.47%

-23.54%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.51%

-27.20%

-13.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-6.71%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

1.79%

+3.52%

Volatility

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock EuroFund Fund (MAEFX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that MAEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAEFXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

3.30%

+3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

8.39%

+8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.24%

10.34%

+9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

12.27%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

12.65%

+8.92%

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAEFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAEFX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

MAEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
MAEFX
BlackRock EuroFund Fund
10.93%11.58%1.29%1.24%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.45%2.81%1.19%2.32%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MAEFX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAEFX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to FASGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAEFX dropped -62.58% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAEFX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer