MADE vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MADE (iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from iShares - MADE tracks the S&P U.S. Manufacturing Select Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MADE returned 50.25% vs 15.30% for IGF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MADE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

MADE vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MADE achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.05% return.

MADE

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 22.94%
• 6M: 24.56%
• 1Y: 50.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MADE vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MADE iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF	22.94%	27.34%	2.10%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	8.05%	21.31%	7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MADE and IGF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.51

The correlation between MADE and IGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

MADE vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MADE	IGF
Industrials	72.6%	38.8%
Technology	16.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Energy	1.8%	20.1%
Utilities	0.1%	41.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

MADE vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MADE

MADE Risk / Return Rank: 75
MADE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MADE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
MADE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MADE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MADE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 44
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MADE vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MADE	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.47	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	2.10	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.26	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	2.62	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.45	8.05	+8.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MADE vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MADE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MADE and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MADE	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.47	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	0.24	+1.05

Drawdowns

MADE vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MADE drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADE and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MADE	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.79%	-58.33%	+34.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.43%	-5.87%	-7.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.43%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-11.87%	+8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	1.90%	+1.16%

Volatility

MADE vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.68%. This indicates that MADE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MADE	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	3.68%	+3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.99%	8.59%	+8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.51%	10.49%	+10.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.30%	13.99%	+8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.30%	16.83%	+5.47%

MADE vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MADE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

MADE vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

MADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than IGF's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.98%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
MADE iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF	0.65%	0.89%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MADE and IGF in my portfolio?

MADE and IGF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MADE or IGF?

MADE has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to IGF (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MADE dropped -23.79% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, MADE or IGF?

On 1-year performance, MADE leads with 50.25% vs 15.30% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MADE or IGF?

Over the 1-year period, MADE has performed better with a 50.25% return vs 15.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MADE or IGF?

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MADE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MADE or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.65% for MADE.

What is the main difference between MADE and IGF?

MADE tracks S&P U.S. Manufacturing Select Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MADE and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MADE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.