MACPX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
MACPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 7, 1973. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
MACPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MACPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MACPX BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund | -1.97% | 15.58% | 12.77% | 16.88% | -15.50% | 16.76% | 15.37% | 21.86% | -3.18% | 14.61% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MACPX achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MACPX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.48%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
MACPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MACPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MACPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MACPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
MACPX
FASGX
MACPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.73 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.55 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 6.89 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.53 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.70 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.60 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MACPX and FASGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MACPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
MACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.97%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MACPX BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund | 8.97% | 8.79% | 7.66% | 3.00% | 3.91% | 12.46% | 4.22% | 5.49% | 8.12% | 19.65% | 4.94% | 5.32% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
MACPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MACPX drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACPX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.75% | -47.35% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -9.07% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.84% | -23.54% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.59% | -27.20% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.18% | -7.95% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -6.74% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.04% | -0.30% |
Volatility
MACPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) is 3.52%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that MACPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 4.57% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.06% | 7.78% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 12.82% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.03% | 12.14% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 12.56% | -1.15% |