MACPX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MACPX (BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, MACPX returned 10.72%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MACPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

MACPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACPX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MACPX having a 10.72% annualized return and FASGX not far behind at 10.31%.

MACPX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 8.48%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

FASGX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MACPX BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund	8.17%	15.58%	12.77%	16.88%	-15.50%	16.76%	15.37%	21.86%	-3.18%	14.61%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.90%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MACPX and FASGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1991	0.91

The correlation between MACPX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MACPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACPX

MACPX Risk / Return Rank: 72
MACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MACPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.36	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.26	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.44	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.29	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.49	14.19	-0.70

MACPX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACPX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MACPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACPX drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACPX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MACPX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.75%	-47.35%	+5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-7.95%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.62%	-12.80%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.84%	-23.54%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.59%	-27.20%	+2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.12%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-6.70%	+1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	1.84%	-0.38%

Volatility

MACPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) is 3.44%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that MACPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MACPX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	4.58%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	9.28%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.77%	11.10%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	12.40%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.51%	12.71%	-1.20%

MACPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

MACPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

MACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
MACPX BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund	8.13%	8.79%	7.66%	3.00%	3.91%	12.46%	4.22%	5.49%	8.12%	19.65%	4.94%	5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MACPX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MACPX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MACPX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to MACPX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACPX dropped -41.75% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.