PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACPX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACPX achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MACPX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 10.58%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


MACPX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.63%
YTD
9.15%
6M
10.10%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.58%

ASFYX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.77%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MACPX
BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund
9.15%15.58%12.77%16.88%-15.50%16.76%15.37%21.86%-3.18%14.61%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MACPX and ASFYX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.20

Over the past year, MACPX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MACPX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACPX
MACPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACPXASFYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.20

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

2.93

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.95

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.62

17.88

-3.26

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACPX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACPXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.20

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.22

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.23

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.35

+0.32

Drawdowns

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACPX drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACPX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACPXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.75%

-36.43%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-5.24%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-30.32%

+19.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.84%

-36.43%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.59%

-36.43%

+11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.22%

+18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-13.18%

+7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.45%

-0.04%

Volatility

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) is 2.58%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that MACPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACPXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

3.67%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

9.54%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

11.77%

-3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

13.77%

-2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.47%

12.71%

-1.24%

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MACPX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

MACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
MACPX
BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund
8.06%8.79%7.66%3.00%3.91%12.46%4.22%5.49%8.12%19.65%4.94%5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


MACPX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to MACPX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACPX dropped -41.75% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

MACPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MACPX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer