PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACMX vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MACMX vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACMX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MACMX has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 2.49%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.


MACMX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.49%

VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACMX vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MACMX
BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund
1.79%4.41%3.91%4.96%-8.76%4.70%1.45%6.81%1.26%7.25%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MACMX and VWO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005

-0.05

The correlation between MACMX and VWO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MACMX vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACMX
MACMX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MACMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MACMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACMX vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACMXVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.36

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.76

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

9.96

-1.59

MACMX vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACMX and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACMXVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.94

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.30

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.46

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.27

+0.92

Drawdowns

MACMX vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACMX drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACMX and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACMXVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-67.68%

+54.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-11.17%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.24%

-17.37%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.65%

-32.64%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.65%

-36.39%

+22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.41%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-15.82%

+13.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

3.09%

-2.34%

Volatility

MACMX vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) is 1.08%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that MACMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACMXVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

5.61%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

13.22%

-11.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

15.89%

-13.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.20%

17.37%

-13.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.07%

19.20%

-15.13%

MACMX vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MACMX vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

MACMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than VWO's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MACMX
BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.68%4.77%3.93%2.68%1.90%1.80%2.02%2.74%4.60%3.19%2.82%3.43%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


MACMX and VWO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to MACMX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACMX dropped -13.65% vs VWO's -67.68%.

MACMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MACMX and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer