MACMX vs. QDSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MACMX (BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund) and QDSIX (AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund) are both mutual funds - MACMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while QDSIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by AQR Funds. Over the past 5 years, MACMX returned 1.37%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for QDSIX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MACMX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QDSIX.

Performance

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACMX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than QDSIX's 6.42% return.

MACMX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 2.49%

QDSIX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 7.88%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MACMX BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund	1.79%	4.41%	3.91%	4.96%	-8.76%	4.70%	4.91%
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund	6.42%	16.36%	9.71%	8.88%	14.69%	10.64%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MACMX and QDSIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020	-0.01

The correlation between MACMX and QDSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MACMX vs. QDSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACMX

MACMX Risk / Return Rank: 57
MACMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MACMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MACMX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MACMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MACMX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

QDSIX

QDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
QDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
QDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MACMX	QDSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.05	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	4.56	-1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.59	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	7.82	-5.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	22.82	-14.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the QDSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACMX and QDSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MACMX	QDSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	3.05	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	1.47	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	1.66	-0.48

Drawdowns

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACMX drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, which is greater than QDSIX's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACMX and QDSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MACMX	QDSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.65%	-7.06%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.50%	-1.96%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.24%	-6.90%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.65%	-7.06%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-1.44%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.67%	+0.08%

Volatility

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) is 1.08%, while AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that MACMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MACMX	QDSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.38%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	3.60%	-1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88%	5.04%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.20%	7.64%	-3.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.07%	7.32%	-3.25%

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than QDSIX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MACMX vs. QDSIX - Dividend Comparison

MACMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than QDSIX's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MACMX BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund	3.68%	4.77%	3.93%	2.68%	1.90%	1.80%	2.02%	2.74%	4.60%	3.19%	2.82%	3.43%
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund	2.10%	2.23%	0.00%	11.35%	8.22%	6.07%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MACMX and QDSIX in my portfolio?

MACMX and QDSIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MACMX or QDSIX?

QDSIX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to MACMX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACMX dropped -13.65% vs QDSIX's -7.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.