MACMX vs. PTIAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MACMX (BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund) and PTIAX (Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - MACMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while PTIAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Performance Trust Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, MACMX returned 2.49%/yr vs 2.90%/yr for PTIAX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MACMX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PTIAX.

Performance

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) and Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACMX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than PTIAX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MACMX has underperformed PTIAX with an annualized return of 2.49%, while PTIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.90% annualized return.

MACMX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 2.49%

PTIAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: 1.06%
• 10Y*: 2.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MACMX BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund	1.79%	4.41%	3.91%	4.96%	-8.76%	4.70%	1.45%	6.81%	1.26%	7.25%
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund	0.86%	6.92%	3.52%	7.48%	-12.84%	1.15%	5.73%	7.36%	2.01%	7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MACMX and PTIAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.29

Over the past year, MACMX and PTIAX have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MACMX vs. PTIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACMX

MACMX Risk / Return Rank: 57
MACMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MACMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MACMX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MACMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MACMX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PTIAX

PTIAX Risk / Return Rank: 31
PTIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PTIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PTIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PTIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PTIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) and Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MACMX	PTIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.60	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.40	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.29	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.16	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	6.17	+2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the PTIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACMX and PTIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MACMX	PTIAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	1.60	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.21	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.72	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	1.22	-0.04

Drawdowns

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACMX drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, smaller than the maximum PTIAX drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACMX and PTIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MACMX	PTIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.65%	-16.90%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.50%	-2.99%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.24%	-4.96%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.65%	-16.90%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.65%	-16.90%	+3.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.39%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-2.44%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	1.04%	-0.29%

Volatility

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) is 1.08%, while Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that MACMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MACMX	PTIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.44%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	2.84%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88%	4.04%	-1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.20%	4.97%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.07%	4.04%	+0.03%

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIAX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

MACMX vs. PTIAX - Dividend Comparison

MACMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than PTIAX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MACMX BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund	3.68%	4.77%	3.93%	2.68%	1.90%	1.80%	2.02%	2.74%	4.60%	3.19%	2.82%	3.43%
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund	4.76%	4.68%	4.44%	4.03%	3.96%	3.01%	3.86%	4.11%	4.47%	5.51%	5.49%	4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MACMX and PTIAX in my portfolio?

MACMX and PTIAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MACMX or PTIAX?

PTIAX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to MACMX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MACMX dropped -13.65% vs PTIAX's -16.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MACMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.