PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAAY vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAAY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAAY achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.


MAAY

1D
0.13%
1M
4.35%
YTD
-15.55%
6M
-31.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAAY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MAAY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF
-15.55%-27.95%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MAAY and QYLD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAAY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAAY

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAAY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MAAY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAAYQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.93

0.59

-2.52

Drawdowns

MAAY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAAY drawdown since its inception was -45.22%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAAY and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAAYQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.22%

-24.75%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.90%

-0.06%

-39.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-3.84%

-27.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

MAAY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAAYQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.16%

8.58%

+21.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.16%

14.70%

+15.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.16%

15.49%

+14.67%

MAAY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAAY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAAY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

MAAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.86%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAAY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF
131.86%31.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAAY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MAAY.

MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 131.86%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

MAAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MAAY and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAAY and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer