MAAY vs. QYLD
MAAY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. MAAY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAAY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
MAAY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAAY achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
MAAY
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 6M
- -31.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
MAAY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | -15.55% | -27.95% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAAY and QYLD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAAY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
MAAY
QYLD
MAAY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAAY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.93 | 0.59 | -2.52 |
Drawdowns
MAAY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAAY drawdown since its inception was -45.22%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAAY and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAAY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.22% | -24.75% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.90% | -0.06% | -39.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.44% | -3.84% | -27.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
MAAY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAAY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.16% | 8.58% | +21.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.16% | 14.70% | +15.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.16% | 15.49% | +14.67% |
MAAY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAAY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAAY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
MAAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.86%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | 131.86% | 31.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAAY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MAAY.
MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 131.86%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.
MAAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MAAY and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for MAAY and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer